July 27-31, 2026
Summer Orgo Intensive 2026: what the class said
Eight chapters of college-level organic chemistry in five days. At the end of the week every student was asked to review it — honestly, with criticism counting more than praise. Here is the whole result, including the parts that need work.
- 20
- hours of instruction over 5 days
- 9
- note-taking lectures
- 18
- quizzes and problem sets
- 18
- concept-review and extra-practice sets
- 1
- comprehensive final exam
“How likely would you recommend this intensive to a friend preparing for USNCO or studying Orgo?”
No response came in below 8. Based on all 9 live students and 2 recording students who completed the end-of-week reflection.
Distribution of 11 responses on a 0 to 10 scale: 0 students rated 0; 0 students rated 1; 0 students rated 2; 0 students rated 3; 0 students rated 4; 0 students rated 5; 0 students rated 6; 0 students rated 7; 2 students rated 8; 3 students rated 9; 6 students rated 10.
Asked separately to calibrate the week, seven of eleven rated the problem sets harder than average — and not one student called the pace, difficulty, or workload extreme in either direction.
What helped most
Each student picked up to three.
- Lectures9/11
- Post-class problem sets6/11
- Challenging problems5/11
- Concept-review sets4/11
- Reviewing explanations after submitting3/11
- Extra-practice sets2/11
- In-class Q&A2/11
- Final exam1/11
- Pre-class quizzes1/11
What was still shaky at the end
Select all that apply. Nobody picked “feeling solid” — in five days you get the foundation, not mastery.
- Elimination (E1/E2)10/11
- Substitution (SN1/SN2)7/11
- Alkene additions6/11
- Alkanes, isomers & conformations3/11
- Reactivities and mechanisms3/11
- Stereochemistry2/11
- Structure & bonding1/11
- Acids & bases1/11
- None — feeling solid0/11
In their own words
What they could do that they couldn't a week earlier
Quotes are from the end-of-week reflection, lightly trimmed for length. Students are identified by grade and state only.
I did self-study O Chem last year for USNCO, but it was more passive learning because I just read some textbooks, and during the local and national ones I kind of just went with my gut feeling because I wasn't practicing the problems a lot. This program gave me a more structured approach with more practice problems to apply skills.
A LOT. E1, SN1, SN2, E2 reactions. I finally understood chirality, and now I can identify chiral molecules. Chair conformations of cyclohexane really helped, and now I'm able to draw those as well as identify the best form.
I am now capable of answering the majority of the organic chemistry questions on USNCO exams, and I understand the concept of resonance and resonance structures to a much better extent. I am able to detect common patterns between different topics, to make educated guesses for concepts I may not be too familiar with.
How the week felt
I didn't know anything about organic chemistry before this class, so except the AP Chemistry review sections everything was new to me. The workload was challenging but it was also rewarding, and the quiz-lecture-problem set rhythm helped me retain the concepts well.
I think I learned a lot in this class, not just about organic chemistry but also USNCO problem solving skills. I liked the constant problem sets, and the USNCO-styled questions pulled directly from different chemistry olympiads were a good challenge for me.
The pacing was good, with various questions being covered and answered. The depth of the discussions was very comprehensive. The problem set rhythm was reasonable and intensive without being overwhelming.
The week was fast and intensive and very useful in learning organic chemistry. The problem sets and practice reinforced the lectures, and doing hundreds of questions drilled in the concepts. The workload was heavy, but it was heavy in a good way.
Because I decided to go with the recording option for the lectures, the pace felt a little more relaxed — I was able to self-correct for the time I needed on a specific topic.
The moment it clicked
My most memorable moment was during our lecture on hydrogenation, looking at that diagram drawn on the lecture notes — how the H2 molecules essentially act as radicals on the surface of the metal, attacking the pi bond two at a time. That visual, of the hydrogens sitting as little bumps on the metal surface, made it a lot easier to understand the mechanism.
Doing challenge problem #3 on the reactivities and mechanisms homework — the long arrow-pushing one. The one we did in class I wasn't too confident about and we did together, but doing this problem on my own was very satisfying, just to see the overall reaction.
Acting on it
What changes for 2027
The point of asking for criticism is to use it. Every item below comes straight from what this class wrote.
- 1
More class time on substitution and elimination, and an earlier start on them
Ten of eleven students named E1/E2 as still shaky, and seven named SN1/SN2. They land on days 4-5, right where several students said the pace bit hardest — and one asked directly for less time on the early basics and more on the reaction mechanisms.
- 2
Introduce the degrees-of-unsaturation formula in the first two days
Students working isomer-counting problems said they only met it partway through, after they had already struggled with those questions.
- 3
Shorter written solutions, and challenge problems labeled by difficulty
The detailed explanations were called useful but too long to reread, and students wanted to know which challenge problems to try first.
- 4
A written summary posted after each class, plus an advanced-topics reading list
Concepts covered orally in class — periplanarity in elimination, free-radical reactions — were hard to recover afterwards from notes alone.
- 5
Rework the pre-class quizzes and the fill-in-the-blank lecture notes
Pre-class quizzes drew one pick out of eleven, the lowest of any component alongside the final exam, and several students said the note blanks went unfilled during fast lectures.
What they asked for next
Which packets they wanted first
Asked which future MCQ packet topics they wanted, seven of eleven asked for all seven — and every single one asked for mixed USNCO-style review.
- Mixed USNCO-style review11/11
- Aromatic chemistry9/11
- Carboxylic acids & derivatives9/11
- Spectroscopy / structure determination9/11
- Alcohols & ethers8/11
- Aldehydes & ketones8/11
- Amines7/11
I could treat each packet as a problem set to do after each chapter, and do them to the best of my ability. I hope that with repeated practice and reading, I will be able to advance to the USNCO national level.
I'm using the packets to review before USNCO Locals and Nationals — going back to the questions I struggled with or got wrong, and completing the ones I didn't get to. My goal is to make Honors next year.
The packets would really help me study ALL of o-chem so I could make it to camp and win other competitions.
I plan to review the packets and look for similar practice problems, along with using them to study for USNCO Locals.
Missed the week? The full recording is available.
Everything this class worked through — 20 hours of instruction over 5 days, 9 note-taking lectures, 18 quizzes and problem sets, 18 concept-review and extra-practice sets, 1 comprehensive final exam — the same materials they reviewed above, at your own pace.
About these numbers
Every student who attended live completed the end-of-week reflection, along with 2 students who took the recording — 11 responses in total. Every figure on this page is shown with its denominator. Responses were submitted through a Google Form; the survey asked for criticism explicitly, and completing it was not tied to how positive the answers were. Quotes are trimmed for length and normalized for spelling, with wording unchanged, and students are identified by grade and state only.